English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Material and Methods: 52 subjects who met the inclusion criteria were randomized into either control group or experimental group. Control group was given conventional treatment alone which included moist heat and TENS whereas Experimental group was given hip internal rotation mobilization and the same conventional treatment for six consecutive days. Outcome measures were Visual Analogue Scale, Oswestry Disability Index and Internal Rotation Range of Motion were recorded.

international journal of physiotherapy and research/international journal of physiotherapy research

TO COMPARE THE EFFECTS OF INTERNAL ROTATION MOBILIZATION OF HIP WITH CONVENTIONAL PHYSIOTHERAPY TREATMENT IN PATIENTS WITH LOW BACK PAIN: RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRAIL