English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The purpose of this researchto compare the motor profile of schoolchildren from the initial years of Elementary Schoolwho have undergone repetition with non-repeating children. It sought to understand the need to overcome some paradigms thatare invigorating in the daily school life, which can influence the teaching and learning process. The population was composed ofchildren enrolled in the public network, and the sample was organized into two groups: experimental and control. TheExperimental Group - 40 children from 7 to 11 years of chronological, who had at least one repetition in some series. The Controlgroup of the same number of schoolchildren, with the same chronological ages and gender, without repetition. These groupswere applied the Motor Development Scale protocol - Rosa Neto (2002). Thus, the indicators were constructed to analyze thepreviously defined parameters: Steps to estimate the motor profile of schoolchildren. The results showed that there is a differencebetweenthe chronological and motor ages, (IMG <IC). The Control group was composed of the same number of schoolchildren,with the same chronological ages and gender, without repetition. Were applied the Motor Development Scale protocol - RosaNeto (2002). Thus, the indicators were constructed to analyze the previously defined parameters: steps to estimate the motorprofile of the students. The results showed that there is a difference between the chronological and motor ages, (IMG <IC).Portant, the development of the general motor, in the students investigated, presented in a non-linear way, that is, a variabilityoccurred according to age, gender and independent group of reprobation in some series.

the fiep bulletin

COMPARATIVE BETWEEN THE ENGINE DEVELOPMENT PROFILE OF REPRESENTATIVE REPEAT STUDENT AND NON-REPEAT SCHOOLS IN THE INITIAL YEARS OF FUNDAMENTAL TEACHING