English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Prosthetic alignment is an important factor in the overall fit and performance of a lower-limb prosthesis. However, the association between prosthetic alignment and control strategies used by persons with transfemoral amputation to coordinate the movement of a passive prosthetic knee is poorly understood. This study investigated the biomechanical response of persons with transfemoral amputation to systematic perturbations in knee joint alignment during a level walking task. Quantitative gait data were collected for three alignment conditions: bench alignment, 2 cm anterior knee translation (ANT), and 2 cm posterior knee translation (POST). In response to a destabilizing alignment perturbation (i.e., the ANT condition), participants significantly increased their early-stance hip extension moment, confirming that persons with transfemoral amputation rely on a hip extensor strategy to maintain knee joint stability. However, participants also decreased the rate at which they loaded their prosthesis, decreased their affected-side step length, increased their trunk flexion, and maintained their prosthesis in a more vertical posture at the time of opposite toe off. Collectively, these results suggest that persons with transfemoral amputation rely on a combination of strategies to coordinate stance-phase knee flexion. Further, comparatively few significant changes were observed in response to the POST condition, suggesting that a bias toward posterior alignment may have fewer implications in terms of stance-phase, knee joint control.

The biomechanical response of persons with transfemoral amputation to variations in prosthetic knee alignment during level walking