English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In the simplified analysis of seismic design of gravity quay walls based on the pseudo-static approach, selection of an appropriate horizontal seismic coefficient (k h ) is important for computing the equivalent pseudo-static inertial force. However, there is no unified standard for defining k h . There are conflicts among the existing k h  definitions regarding whether it considers (a) the effect of wall height on maximum horizontal acceleration (MHA) used in the determination of k h  or (b) the application of correction factor for k h  according to seismic performance grade. This paper evaluates the relevance of these conflicts by initially reviewing the k h  definitions in the existing codes and guidelines for port structures and then by performing a series of dynamic centrifuge tests on caisson gravity quay walls of different wall heights (5, 10 and 15 m). A review of the existing codes and guidelines has shown that the correction factor for k h  should be specified according to the seismic performance grade for the economical design of quay walls. On the other hand, based on the centrifuge tests, it was found that the MHA used in k h  calculation and the correction factor for considering seismic performance grade should reflect the effect of wall height.

Assessment of horizontal seismic coefficient for gravity quay walls by centrifuge tests