English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The tomato pinworm (TPW), Keiferia lycopersicella (Walsingham), is an important pest of tomato in southern California (Oatman 1970), Texas (Wellik et al. 1979) and Florida (Poe 1974). In Florida this insect pest increases to tremendous numbers late in the tomato season (namely in spring) when the plants mature. In a number of instances, dense populations (2 to 10 larvae/leaf) have resulted in large scale death of the plants, despite frequent insecticide applications (D.R.S, field observation). Currently growers use chemical insecticides to manage TPW in commercial fields; but the degree of control is not satisfactory in large measure because of the deficiencies in the current spray programs and detection method. The use of broadspectrum insecticides for TPW control may induce development of resistance, or induce outbreaks of secondary pests (Smith 1970; Brown & Pal 1971). Cultural practices such as burning of crop residues, crop rotations, manipulation of planting dates, etc. helped suppress the TPW population (Elmore & Howard 1943; Poe 1974). However, insecticides are the only tool for pest management that is reliable for emergency action when insect pest populations approach or exceed the economic threshold (Metcalf 1975). Therefore, efforts are needed to evaluate less detrimental insecticides for control of TPW. Bacillus thuringiensis has become an effective insecticide in the management of various insect pests (Burgerjon & Martouret 1971); however, resistance to B. thuringiensis toxin has been documented through laboratory studies in 12 species of Lepidoptera, 2 species of Coleoptera and 5 species of Diptera (Tabashnik 1994). When compared to the response of a fully susceptible strain the level of resistance observed in most instances did not exceed 50to 100-fold. For coping with resistance to B. thuringiensis protein toxins, it will be very important to determine the level of resistance that a given population can develop, and the cross-resistance spectrum of this resistance. Considerably more information of benefit to management would be obtained if the mode of inheritance of the resistance could also be determined. The overall objective of the present study was to characterize the toxicity of a selected B. thuringiensis toxin to a number of geographically diverse populations of the TPW. Insects. The study was conducted in a private quarantine facility at Labelle, Florida. Mixed instars of TPW were collected from tomato over a period of time from 4 locations in Florida (Tropical Research and Education Center, Homestead; commercial field, Homestead; BHN Laboratories Naples; commercial field, Naples); three commercial locations in California (Cameron, Hurron, California-South) and three commercial locations in Sinaloa, Mexico (2 locations at Guasava on two dates, and LaPalma). TPW larvae from each location were shipped to Labelle in strict accordance with quarantine procedures. All shipments were secured in the quarantine facility to separate the live TPW larvae. A colony from each geographic population was established on 'Flora-Dade' tomato transplants within the quarantine facility in a separate room to prevent any intermixing. The escape of live insects was prevented by not handling any insects outside the quarantine facility. Each colony was maintained for 2 generations prior to use in the bioassay study. Sufficient numbers of the required developmental stage of TPW were collected from the cultures to run bioassays using the selected B. thuringiensis toxin. At the end of each bioassay all live specimens were destroyed by heating in an autoclave. Bacillus thuringiensis toxins. Sufficient amount of selected toxin of B. thuringiensis var. kurstaki (Cry 1, Monsanto) was supplied by BHN Research, Bonita Springs, Florida. The toxin was stored in a refrigerator at 6?C at Tropical Research and Education Center, Homestead, Florida for future use. Bioassay procedure. A leaf-dip bioassay was conducted in the laboratory. Five concentrations of the selected B. thuringiensis toxin (0, 6.25, 12.50, 25.00, 50.00 and 100.00 ,ug/ml of water) were prepared in 0.02% Tween 20 (Sigma St. Louis, MO). The concentrations of B. thuringiensis protein were prepared following a serial dilution method, where a factor of 0.5 was used in each dilution step. Each concentration was made up to a total volume of 20 ml in a test tube. Freshly cut tomato leaflets (eight leaflets/concentration) were immersed in each suspension for one minute. The leaves were removed and air dried. To avoid leaf desiccation, the petiole of each leaf was wrapped with moist cotton, which was kept moist by adding a drop of distilled water daily.

TOXICITY OF BACILLUS THURINGIENSIS CRY1-TYPE INSECTICIDAL TOXIN TO GEOGRAPHICALLY DISTANT POPULATIONS OF TOMATO PINWORM