English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Idea formulated by social groups, recently, regarding protected areas in Brazil, bring back the old rural-urban confl ict known as "urban bias". What is implied in this confl ict is that the urban bias of public policies is a strategy for drawing resources from rural to urban areas, reproducing rural poverty. The paper focus on how rural owners react to public policies regarding forest conservation. Empirical observation is based on interviews of 22 rural owners of rural tourism business, around the Iguacu Park, in the state of Parana, Brazil. Findings show that almost all interviewees believe that forest conservation brings positive results to society, in general. But, when local development and the farm are taken into consideration, people tend to have a negative perception regarding public policies in favor of forest conservation. The rational of this negative perception and the need for reviewing public policies for protecting areas are discussed in the paper.

Conservação ambiental no campo ou estratégia de transferência de recursos do rural ao urbano