English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Due to the popularity of Google Earth (GE), users commonly assume that it is a credible and accurate source of information. Consequently, GE’s imagery is frequently used in scientific and others projects. However, Google states that data available in their geographic products are only approximations and, therefore, their accuracy is not officially documented. In this paper, the horizontal positional accuracy of GE’s imagery is assessed by means of comparing coordinates extracted from a rural cadastral database against coordinates extracted from well-defined and inferred check points in GE’s imagery. The results suggest that if a large number of well-defined points are extracted from areas of high resolution imagery, GE’s imagery over rural areas meets the horizontal accuracy requirements of the ASPRS for the production of “Class 1” 1:20,000 maps. Nonetheless, the results also show that georegistration and large horizontal errors occur in GE’s imagery. Consequently, despite its overall horizontal positional accuracy, coordinates extracted from GE’s imagery should be used with caution.

Horizontal positional accuracy of Google Earth's imagery over rural areas: a study case in Tamaulipas, Mexico