English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

I read the recent report on the scoring system, recommended by the Brazilian National Ministry of Health (NMH), for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis (TB) with great interest.(1) Pedrozo et al. concluded that “The NMH system scores were significantly higher in the TB and TB/HIV groups than in the other two groups. Therefore, this scoring system was valid for the diagnosis of pulmonary TB in this population, regardless of HIV status.”(1) I have some concerns regarding this report. First, the scoring system cannot exclude latent TB, which might be a major problem in actual practice. Second, it remains questionable whether the NMH system is a user-friendly tool. If it is not easy to use, it will not be employed. Third, to complete a diagnostic test assessment, the diagnostic properties (sensitivity, specificity, Scoring system, recommended by the Brazilian National Ministry of Health, for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis

Scoring system, recommended by the Brazilian National Ministry of Health, for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis.