English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

EnglishThe objective of this essay is to situate Plato’s critique of poetry in the Republic on its implicit conceptual base, giving visibility to important aspects postulated ab anteriori to the critique. The theological motivation for the defense and apprehension of Dike in its formal manifestation, on both political and individual levels, leads us to examine a morphism between the parts of the psyche and the polis. The principle of the insufficiency of the polis elements applied to the psyche leads to a more positive appreciation of the concupiscent part of the soul. However, that same portion of the soul is responsible for introducing luxury. And luxury in the individual’s soul, or in the polis, is responsible for the need for defense and for a government to manage an aggregate of wide dimension. In a wide dimension psychism, or in an inflated polis for the satisfaction of superfluous needs, the need for resource management introduces a calculation principle which results in the rise of reason. However, the role of reason is to confine the concupiscent part of the soul, from where it comes, thus its paradoxical aspect. However, it is the calculation and the measure of the reason of rulers that impose, as a condition to come true, a formation which is very restrictive to the concupiscent part of the soul and is incompatible with the mimetic form of the poiesis. It is as if reason were a product of the desire aimed at suppressing it and as if poiesis were a means to resist desire from reason. portuguesO objetivo deste ensaio e situar a critica de Platao a poesia na Republica nas suas bases conceituais implicitas, dando visibilidade para importantes aspectos postulados ab anteriori a critica. A motivacao teologica da defesa e da apreensao de Dike na sua manifestacao formal, nos niveis individual e politico, conduz ao exame de um morfismo entre as partes da psyche e da polis. O principio da insuficiencia dos elementos da polis aplicado a psyche conduz a uma apreciacao mais positiva da parte concupiscente da alma. Todavia, essa mesma parte da alma e responsavel pela introducao do luxo. E e o luxo na alma do individuo, ou na polis, o responsavel pela necessidade da defesa e de um governo para a gestao de um agregado de dimensao ampla. Em uma psyche de dimensao ampla, ou em uma polis inchada para a satisfacao de necessidades superfluas, a necessaria gestao dos recursos introduz um principio de calculo, o qual e responsavel pelo aparecimento da razao. Mas, a atuacao da razao e de contencao da parte concupiscente da qual se originou, donde seu aspecto paradoxal. Entretanto, sao o calculo e a medida da razao dos governantes os que impoem como condicao para a sua realizacao uma formacao que e muito restritiva para com a parte concupiscente da alma e que e incompativel com a forma mimetica da poiesis. E como se a razao fosse um produto do desejo destinado a suprimi-lo, e a poiesis um meio de resistencia do desejo a razao.

Prolegômenos para a crítica de Platão à poesia na República