English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

OBJETIVO: Estudar o desempenho de escolares da 4ª série em tarefas de leitura e escrita e de consciência fonológica. MÉTODOS: Trinta e dois escolares de 4ª série (50,0% meninas), entre nove e 11 anos, foram avaliados segundo os procedimentos: anamnese, avaliação da leitura, escrita (54 itens linguísticos) e consciência fonológica. Foram divididos em: GPI: escreveram e, após, leram em voz alta; GPII: leram em voz alta e, após, escreveram; GCI: apenas escreveram; GCII: apenas leram. RESULTADOS: Na escrita, GPII apresentou as maiores médias de acerto, sendo que GPI, GPII e GCI apresentaram melhor desempenho para as palavras frequentes, seguido das pseudopalavras e das de baixa frequência. Na leitura, os desempenhos dos GPI, GPII e GCII foram semelhantes, sendo que GPI e GPII apresentaram mais acertos para as pseudopalavras, seguido das de alta frequência. A correlação entre consciência fonológica e escrita mostrou-se moderada e entre consciência fonológica e leitura e entre escrita e leitura foi bem fraca. CONCLUSÕES: A consciência fonológica mostrou moderada correlação com a escrita e baixa com a leitura; a característica psicolinguística baixa familiaridade determinou as maiores médias de erro, tanto na leitura quanto na escrita. PURPOSE: To study the performance of 4th grade students on reading, writing and phonological awareness tasks. METHODS: Thirty-two 4th grade children (50% of each gender), with ages between nine and 11 years, were evaluated according to the following procedure: anamnesis, reading and writing task (54 linguistic tokens), and phonological awareness task. The students were divided into two research groups and two comparison groups: GPI: carried out the writing task first, and then the reading task; GPII: completed the reading, followed by the writing task; GCI: completed only the writing items; GCII: completed only the reading items. RESULTS: In the writing task, GPII showed the highest rates of correct answers, and GPI, GPII and GCI had better performances in writing high frequency words, followed by pseudowords and low frequency words. The reading evaluation showed that the performances of GPI, GPII and GCII were similar, and GPI and GPII had more correct answers for pseudowords, followed by high frequency words. The correlation between phonological awareness and writing was moderate, while correlations between phonological awareness and reading, and writing and reading were very weak. CONCLUSION: Phonological awareness was moderately correlated to the performance on the writing task, and weakly correlated to the performance on the reading task. The psycholinguistic feature low familiarity determined the highest error averages, both in reading and writing tasks

Competência ortográfica e metafonológica: influências e correlações na leitura e escrita de escolares da 4ª série