English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

OBJETIVO: Comparar a produção de fala de crianças com deficiência auditiva neurossensorial à de crianças com neuropatia auditiva/ dessincronia auditiva, ambas submetidas à cirurgia de implante coclear. MÉTODOS: Participaram do estudo cinco crianças com deficiência auditiva neurossensorial e cinco crianças com neuropatia auditiva/dessincronia auditiva; os dois grupos foram pareados segundo idade e tempo de uso do implante coclear, sendo utilizada uma amostra da fala durante as tarefas de nomeação de figuras e discurso espontâneo. RESULTADOS: A média de acertos no grupo de crianças com neuropatia auditiva/dessincronia auditiva foi de 59,32%, contra 51,32% no grupo com deficiência auditiva neurossensorial, não apresentando diferença estatisticamente significante. CONCLUSÃO: O implante coclear demonstrou ser benéfico na reabilitação da neuropatia auditiva/dessincronia auditiva e, assim como na deficiência auditiva neurossensorial, o tempo de privação sensorial influenciou a produção de fala dessas crianças. PURPOSE: To compare the speech production of children with profound hearing loss and children with auditory neuropathy/auditory dys-synchrony, both groups with cochlear implants. METHODS: Five children with profound hearing loss and five children with auditory neuropathy/auditory dys-synchrony participated on the study; the groups were matched according to age and time of use of the cochlear implant, and were assessed through a speech sample obtained during picture naming and spontaneous production tasks. RESULTS: Children with auditory neuropathy/auditory dys-synchrony had an average of 59,32% of correct responses on the tasks, against 51,32% for the group of children with profound hearing loss. This difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The cochlear implant was beneficial to the rehabilitation of auditory neuropathy/auditory dys-synchrony, as well as in the rehabilitation of profound hearing loss. Period of sensory deprivation influenced the speech production of both groups

Avaliação da produção de fala em crianças deficientes auditivas usuárias de Implante Coclear Multicanal