English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Avaliou-se o efeito de dois sistemas de plantio (sem camalhão e com camalhão) e de três espaçamentos (1,0 × 1,5 m; 1,5 × 2,0 m; e 2,0 × 2,0 m) sobre a qualidade e a produtividade de flor-de-seda aos 60 dias de rebrotação. Utilizou-se o delineamento experimental com blocos casualizados em esquema fatorial 2 × 3 (dois sistemas de manejo do solo e três densidades de plantio) com cinco repetições, em parcelas subdivididas no espaço e no tempo. Plantas escolhidas aleatoriamente foram cortadas, separadas por tratamento e analisadas quanto aos teores de matéria seca (MS), matéria orgânica (MO), cinzas, extrato etéreo (EE), proteína bruta (PB), fibra em detergente neutro (FDN), fibra em detergente ácido (FDA), celulose, hemicelulose, lignina, carboidratos não-fibrosos (CNF) e carboidratos totais (CT) e quanto à produtividade (kg MS/ha). Os sistemas de manejo do solo e as densidades de plantio não influenciaram a composição em MO, cinzas, FDN, EE, lignina, celulose, CNF e CT. As densidades de plantio influenciaram o teor de hemicelulose e FDA. O sistema de manejo do solo com camalhão teve efeito linear decrescente sobre o teor de PB. A maior produtividade de MS (699,72 kg/ha) da flor-de-seda foi verificada no sistema de plantio mais adensado (1,0 m × 1,5 m) e correspondeu a 6.666 plantas/ha. The effect of two soil handling systems was evaluated (without furrow and with furrow), three spacing (1.0 m × 1.5 m; 1.5 m × 2.0 m and 2.0 m × 2.0 m) on the quality and the productivity of rooster tree 60 days after cut. It was used a split-plot (space and time) factorial arrangement in a randomized block design. Factors were two soil handling systems and three planting densities (2 × 3) with five replications per treatment. Plants chosen randomly were cut, separated in accordance with treatments and analyed the contents of dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM), mineral matter (MM), ether extract (EE), crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin, water soluble carbohydrates (WSC), total carbohydrates (TC), and productivity (DM kg/ha). It was observed that the soil handling systems and planting densities did not influence the OM, MM, NDF, EE, lignin, cellulose, WSC and TC. The planting density affected the DM, hemicellulose, and ADF. The CP concentration was lower when using the handling systems with furrow. The DM largest productivity (699.72 kg MS/ha) of the rooster tree was verified in the more dense population (1.0 m × 1.5 m), corresponding to 6,666 plants/ha

Produtividade e qualidade da flor-de-seda em diferentes densidades e sistemas de plantio