English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This study aimed to assess the agreement between measured and self-reported height and weight measures in 632 adults. The agreement was calculated using an intra-class correlation coefficient (estimated by ANOVA using one classification criterion), mean differences and agreement limits, according to Bland and Altman. The intra-category agreement of the nutritional status was assessed by Kappa statistics. In men, ICCs were 0.926 (95%CI: 0.894-0.959) and 0.873 (95%CI: 0.799-0.946), for weight and height measures, respectively, with the following mean difference and agreement limits for BMI: 0.143 kg/m(2) (-2.844-3.129). In women, ICCs were 0.981 (95%CI: 0.973-0.988) and 0.794 (95%CI: 0.687-0.900) respectively, with the following mean difference and agreement limits for BMI: 0.462 kg/m(2) (-2.457-3.382). Kappa coefficients for nutritional status in men and women were, respectively, 0.777 (95%CI: 0.683-0.872) and 0.793 (95%CI: 0.725-0.862). Self-reported measures are appropriate alternatives to classify nutritional status in epidemiological studies.

Concordância de medidas antropométricas em estudo epidemiológico de base populacional: Ribeirão Preto, SP, 2006. Projeto OBEDIARP