English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Objetivo Comparar a antropometria ao exame de Raios-x de dupla varredura para estimativa da composição corporal de idosas diabéticas tipo 2. Métodos A composição corporal de 51 voluntárias de 60 a 70 anos de idade e índice de massa corporal de 19 a 43kg/m² foi avaliada pelas medidas antropométricas das dobras cutâneas do tríceps, suprailíaca e coxa e associadas ao exame de Raios-x de dupla varredura, considerado o padrão ouro. Os intervalos de concordância de Bland e Altman foram os valores do desvio-padrão do coeficiente de variação do exame de Raios-x de dupla varredura e os valores da antropometria deviam estar nessa faixa. Foram comparadas as médias (teste t de Student) e feita a correlação de Pearson. Resultados Os intervalos de concordância foram os seguintes: peso (kg) Média (M)=0,3, Desvio-Padrão (DP)=0,1, massa corporal magra (kg) M=3,0, DP=1,9, massa corporal gorda (kg) M=5,0, DP=3,1, percentual de gordura corporal (%GC) M=5,0, DP=3,1. As médias entre os métodos eram iguais e estavam dentro do intervalo de concordância; em média, a antropometria superestimava a massa corporal magra em 2,31kg, e subestimava a massa corporal gorda e o percentual de gordura corporal em -0,93 kg e -2,7% respectivamente; a correlação entre as estimativas eram significativas (P, r=0,99; MCM, r=0,79; MCG, r=0,93; %GC, r=0,72; p<0,0001). Conclusão Os resultados da antropometria e do exame de Raios-x de dupla varredura foram consistentes. Embora tivesse parte dos resultados da massa corporal gorda e do percentual de gordura corporal fora do intervalo de concordância, os outros resultados foram correspondentes, sugerindo o uso da antropometria para avaliação da composição corporal nessa população. Objective This study aimed to compare anthropometry with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for estimating the body composition of elderly women with type 2 diabetes. Methods The body composition of 51 volunteers aged 60 to 70 years, with body mass indices ranging from 19 and 43kg/m², was determined by anthropometry (triceps, suprailiac and thigh skinfold thicknesses) and dual-energy X-ray, which is considered the gold standard. The Bland-Altman limits of agreement were the standard deviations of the dual-energy X-ray coefficient of variation and the anthropometric values should be in this range. The means were compared by the Student's t-test followed by the Pearson's correlation. Results Limits of agreement: weight (W, kg) M=0.3, SD=0.1, lean body mass (lear body mass, kg) M=3.0, SD=1.9; fat body mass (fat body mass, kg) M=5.0, SD=3.1, percentage of body fat (% body fat) M=5.0, SD=3.1. The means of the two methods were the same and within the limits of agreement. Anthropometry tended to overestimate lear body mass by 2.31 kg and underestimate fat body mass and % BF by -0.93 kg and -2.7%, respectively. The estimates correlated significantly (W, r=0.99; lear body mass, r=0.79; fat body mass, r=0.93; % body fat, r=0.72; p<0.0001). Conclusion The anthropometric and dual-energy x-ray results were consistent. Although some lear body mass and % body fat results were beyond the limits of agreement, the others were within. Therefore, anthropometry can be used to assess the body composition of this population

Composição corporal de idosas diabéticas tipo 2: antropometria vs absorcimetria de raios-X de dupla energia