English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Current stainless steel design codes, like the Eurocode 3, part 1.4, (2006), are still largely based on analogies with carbon steel structural behavior. The net section rupture represents one of the ultimate limit states usually verified for structural elements submitted to normal tension stress. An investigation aiming to evaluate the tension capacity of carbon and stainless steel bolted structural elements was performed and in this article, the results are discussed and compared in terms of stress distribution, and force-displacement curves, among others. The result assessment was done by comparisons to the Eurocode 3 (2003) provisions for carbon and stainless steels. The investigation indicated that when stainless steel is used in certain structural engineering applications like joints under tension forces, the current design criteria based on deformation limits need to be re-evaluated, especially due to the differences in the yields for ultimate deformation and stress ratios.

Numerical and experimental assessment of stainless and carbon bolted tensioned members with staggered bolts