English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Bi-covered (O3´ O3) reconstructed Si(111) surface has been studied by first principles calculations. Three different Bi coverages have been considered: 1 monolayer (ML), 1/3 ML and 2/3 ML, leading to the milkstool, T4 and the honeycomb structural models, respectively. Our total energy calculations show that the milkstool model is the energetically most stable structure for high Bi coverages followed by the T4 model for low Bi coverages, without going through a stable structure for the honeycomb model. We performed theoretical STM simulations for the three structures. For 1 ML coverage we observe the formation of Bi-trimers for occupied states, and a honeycomb image for empty states. It is suggested that the experimentally obtained STM image of a honeycomb structure does not correspond to a Bi-coverage of 2/3 ML, but it could represent a STM image of empty states localized in the T4 sites aside the Bi-trimers of the milkstool model.

brazilian journal of physics

STM images and energetics of the bi-covered (&lt;FONT FACE=Symbol&gt;Ö&lt;/font&gt;3 × &lt;FONT FACE=Symbol&gt;Ö&lt;/FONT&gt;3) reconstructed Si(111) surface