English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

For high technology seedling production systems, nutrition plays an important role, mainly the fertigation with iron chelates to prevent its deficiency. This study had the goal of searching for alternative iron sources with the same nutrient efficiency but lower cost in relation to nutrient solution total cost. An experiment was carried out in 56 cm³-conic-containers tilled with a pine bark/ vermiculite mixed substrate using Fe-DTPA, Fe-EDDHA, Fe-EDDHMA, Fe-EDTA, Fe-HEDTA, FeCl3, FeSO4, FeSO4+citric acid plus a control, and the rootstocks Swingle, Rangpur, Trifoliata and Cleopatra, in a randomized complete block design, with four replicates. Seedlings were evaluated for height, relative chlorophyll index, total and soluble iron leaf concentrations. Cleopatra was the only rootstock observed without visual iron chlorosis symptoms. There was a low relative chlorophyll index for Rangpur, Swingle and Trifoliata rootstocks in the control plots, in agreement with the observed symptoms. High total iron concentrations were found in the control and Fe-EDTA plots, whereas soluble iron represented only a low percent of the total iron. The economical analysis showed the following cost values of iron sources in relation to the nutrient solution total costs: Fe-HEDTA (37.25%) > FeCl3 (4.61%) > Fe-EDDHMA (4.53%) > Fe-EDDHA (3.35%) > Fe-DTPA (2.91%) > Fe-EDTA (1.08%) > FeSO4+citric acid (0.78%) > FeSO4 (0.25%). However, only plants from Fe-EDDHA and Fe-EDDHMA treatments did not present any deficiency visual symptoms. The relative cost of Fe-EDDHA application is low, its efficiency in maintaining iron available in solution resulted in high plant heights, making it recommendable for citric rootstock production in nurseries. No sistema altamente especializado de produção de mudas, a nutrição exerce papel importante, principalmente a fertirrigação com quelatos de ferro para evitar sua deficiência. O objetivo deste estudo foi buscar fontes alternativas de ferro que propiciem a mesma eficiência de aproveitamento e menor custo em relação ao total da solução nutritiva. Avaliaram-se os porta-enxertos Swingle, Cravo, Trifoliata e Cleópatra, em tubetes com substrato de casca de pinus/vermiculita, e as fontes de ferro Fe-DTPA, Fe-EDDHA, Fe-EDDHMA, Fe-EDTA, Fe-HEDTA, FeCl3, FeSO4, FeSO4+ácido cítrico e Testemunha. Utilizouse o delineamento em blocos casualisados, com quatro repetições. Foram analisados altura das plantas, índice relativo de clorofila, teor na folha de Fe total e solúvel. Cleópatra foi o único porta-enxerto que não apresentou sintoma visual de deficiência de ferro. Houve baixo índice relativo de clorofila na Testemunha dos porta-enxertos Cravo, Swingle e Trifoliata, comprovando os sintomas visuais observados. Verificouse alta concentração de Fe total e menor % de ferro solúvel da Testemunha e do Fe-EDTA. Na análise econômica, as fontes de ferro foram classificadas em relação ao custo total da solução nutritiva: Fe-HEDTA (37,25%) > FeCl3 (4,61%) > Fe-EDDHMA (4,53%) > Fe-EDDHA (3,35%) > Fe-DTPA (2,91%) > Fe-EDTA (1,08%) > FeSO4+ácido cítrico (0,78%) > FeSO4 (0,25%). No entanto, somente as plantas dos tratamentos Fe-EDDHA e Fe-EDDHMA não apresentaram sintomas visuais de deficiência. Fe-EDDHA propiciou melhor desempenho sob o aspecto nutricional e na altura das plantas do que Fe-EDDHMA, sendo recomendado para a produção de mudas cítricas nos viveiros

Iron sources for citrus rootstock development grown on pine bark/vermiculite mixed substrate