English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Avalia-se, clínica e comparativamente, o aparelho de fixação externa e pinos intramedulares, quanto ao tempo de recuperação das funções normais e deambulação de cães sadios. Foram utilizados 16 cães sadios separados em dois grupos experimentais de oito animais. No primeiro grupo, os cães foram submetidos à aplicação de um aparelho de fixação externa e, no segundo grupo, submetidos à inserção de dois pinos intramedulares na tíbia esquerda. Os aparelhos de fixação externa foram retirados após 30 dias de avaliação clínica. Observou-se que os cães com fixadores externos tiveram retorno funcional em média de 17,3 dias, enquanto os submetidos à inserção intramedular tiveram retorno aos 4,2 dias. Com esses resultados, conclui-se que o uso de pinos intramedulares tem menor interferência na deambulação em relação ao aparelho de fixação externa. In this study we evaluate the contribution of external skeletal fixation devices and intramedullary pins in the functional recovery of healthy dogs. Sixteen healthy dogs have been divided into two experimental groups of 8 dogs each. The first group was submitted to external skeletal fixation devices and the second group was submitted to intramedullary pins in the left Tibia. The external skeletal fixation was taken out by the thirtieth day of the clinical evaluation. The dogs that were submitted to external fixation devices had functional recovery of the studied limb of 17.3 days (in average), while those submitted to intramedullary pins had the functional recovery of the limb in 4.2 days. We concluded that the intramedullary pins have less interference in the functional recovery of the affected limb when compared to the external skeletal fixation devices

DEAMBULAÇÃO APÓS O USO DE APARELHOS DE FIXAÇÃO EXTERNA OU PINOS INTRAMEDULARES NA TÍBIA DE CÃES SADIOS