English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Executives frequently make policy by decree, by passing standard legislative procedures. Political scientists have been troubled by this process, particularly in presidential systems, where executives frequently do not enjoy the support of legislative majorities, and therefore where policy making by decree may entail the usurpation of legislative authority. We offer a theory of the conditions under which legislators should be expected to tolerate - and perhaps even prefer - policy making by decree rather than through the regular legislative process. A number of factors affect legislative preferences on decree, including the strength of the executive's veto, the independence of the constitutional court, the difficulty of amending the Constitution, the existence and cohesiveness of legislative majority parties or coalitions, and the urgency of policy issues. We conclude that the practice of executive decree by itself does not necessarily imply that legislatures are marginalized from policy making.

Poder de decreto: Chamando os tanques ou usando a caneta?