English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This article aims at discussing the contributions of G. H. Mead's pragmatism for two turns within critical theory. If the first generation of Frankfurt was averse to the American pragmatists, they became central to subsequent generations of critical theorists. Mead's writings is one of the bases of the Habermasian theory of communicative action. It is also at the core of Honneth's notion of recognition. The objective of this article is to reconstruct the reinterpretations of Mead's work developed by these two philosophers, in order to reveal two alternative democratic projects to critical theory from the same pragmatist grounds. In doing this, the article seeks to evince Mead's relevance for contemporary political theory.

Teorias críticas e pragmatismo: a contribuição de G. H. Mead para as renovações da Escola de Frankfurt