English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Compararam-se os resultados da contagem de reticulócitos pela microscopia de luz e pelo método da citometria de fluxo em 25 cães saudáveis (controle), 60 cães com anemia regenerativa e 40 com anemia arregenerativa. Houve diferença nas contagens absolutas obtidas pela microscopia de luz e pela citometria de fluxo nos três grupos estudados. A contagem de reticulócitos foi mais alta pela citometria de fluxo que a contagem pela microscopia de luz, mostrando ser um método mais sensível, simples e seguro para a quantificação de reticulócitos.Counts of reticulocytes using both the light microscopy and flow cytometry (FC) methods in 25 healthy control dogs, 60 dogs with regenerative anemia, and 40 dogs with non-regenerative anemia were compared. The absolute counts were submitted to the paired t-Student test, which determined significant differences (P<0.0001) between those methods in the three studied groups. Counts of retyculocytes were higher under flow cytometry, which proved to be a more sensitive method. Flow cytometry is a simple and reliable method for the quantification of reticulocytes

Contagem de reticulócitos de cães saudáveis ou anêmicos pela citometria de fluxo