English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This article explores some of the concerns and values that are part of the discussion about processes of flexible cohabitation in training in museology producing more nuanced theories, more reflective practices, and possibly less illusory museums. It also introduces a discussion on the very nature of knowledge in museology. Knowledge is theorized as a quasi-object, a hybrid between subject, human and nonhuman, challenging the separation between subject and object, between nature and society, between theory and practice. Museology is presented here as a quasi-object of research / training as a space for questioning not delimiter but which increasingly adopts border contours, impermanent and belonging to what has been denominated Mode 2/3 of knowledge production.

Formação em museologia: círculos e outras geometrias