English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

O presente trabalho teve como objetivo comparar duas metodologias, enzimática e por cromatografia líquida de alta eficiência (CLAE), na determinação dos teores de colesterol em amostras de carne bovina e leite. No método por CLAE utilizou-se coluna C18, 100 x 4,6mm x 4µm (Chromolith, Merck), fase móvel acetonitrila:isopropanol (85:15 para as amostras de carne e 95:05 para amostras de leite) e detector UV-Visível fixado a 210nm. No método enzimático, a absorbância das amostras foi lida em espectrofotômetro a 499nm, 90 minutos após a reação. Foram realizadas 10 análises de cada produto para as duas metodologias avaliadas, sendo que os resultados obtidos mostraram-se semelhantes (p>0,01). Obteve-se recuperação de 95% para as amostras de carne e 97% para as amostras de leite em ambos os métodos. Os resultados obtidos com o material de referência certificado de carne (SRM 1546, NIST) apresentaram-se semelhantes ao declarado no certificado. O coeficiente de variação nas amostras de leite foi de 0,81 e 0,82%, e nas amostras de carne 2,3 e 2,9% para as metodologias cromatográfica e enzimática, respectivamente. O método enzimático mostrou-se sensível e preciso, entretanto, ao contrário da metodologia cromatográfica, necessita de controle rigoroso das condições de análise. The objective of this work was to compare two methods, one enzymatic and the other chromatographic using HPLC, for the determination of cholesterol in meat and milk. For the chromatographic method, a C18 column, 100 x 4.6mm, 4µm (Chromolith, Merck), was used, acetonitrile:isopropanol as the mobile phase (85:15 for samples of meat and 95:05 for samples of milk), a flow rate of 2mL/min and detection by UV-Visible at 210nm. In the enzymatic method, absorbance was read against the blank at 499nm, 90 minutes after the reaction. Each product was analyzed ten times with each methodology, the results being similar (p>0.01). The mean recovery was 95% for the meat samples and 97% for the milk samples with both methodologies. The results obtained for the meat standard reference material (SRM 1546, NIST) were similar to those declared on the certificate. The coefficients of variation for the milk samples were 0.81 and 0.82%, and for the meat samples, 2.3 and 2.9% for the chromatographic and enzymatic methods respectively. The enzymatic method was shown to be sensitive and precise, whilst, to the contrary, the chromatographic method required a rigorous control of the analytical conditions

Avaliação comparativa entre dois métodos para determinação do colesterol em carnes e leite