English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Most of the scientists that publish scientific papers on the magazine Planta Daninha are also involved as reviewers of the manuscripts submitted, since normally the editors are looking for reviewers with expertise in the subject. Thus, when selecting reviewers, the editors objective is to find scientists that have a specialized knowledge of the topic of the submitted article. In this note, we will discuss some of the responsibilities and ethical obligations of reviewers. Most of the ideas herein were adapted from the magazine Weed Technology, v.13, n.4, 1999. Our intention is to help reviewers do a good job, maintaining the quality of the articles or even improving it. Our goal is to make Planta Daninha a magazine known not only nationally, but also internationally in the scientific agricultural community.

Responsabilidades e obrigações éticas dos revisores de artigos científicos da Revista Planta Daninha