English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Breve comentário de um trecho célebre do diálogo entre Ulisses e a psukhé de Aquiles no Hades (Odisséia XI, 478-491), a partir da discussão da hipótese de leitura de Karl Rüter que percebeu aí uma inversão dos papéis tradicionais dos dois heróis em tensão: Ulisses deplorando os sofrimentos do seu nóstos («retorno») e exaltando o kléos («glória») de Aquiles, e a psukhé de Aquiles, por sua vez, desprezando o seu kléos imperecível e valorizando, face ao estado ínfimo de morto, qualquer forma de vida (mesmo a socialmente mais baixa), ou seja: a continuidade da vida implícita no nóstos. A brief commentary on a famous passage of the dialogue between Ulysses and Achilles’ psyche in the Hades (Odyssey XI, 478-491), based on the discussion of the hypothesis of Karl Rüter who noticed there an inversion of the traditional roles of the two heroes in conflict: Ulysses deplores the sufferings of his nostos («regress») and exalts the kleos («glory») of Achilles; Achilles’ psyche, on its turn, disdains his non-perishable kleos and values, having before him the undermost state of the dead, any form of life (even the lowest in society), that is: the continuity of life implied in the nostos

Ulisses e Aquiles repensando a morte (Odisséia XI, 478-491)