English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The chemical treatment evaluation in the field to control post-harvest fruit anthracnose (Colletotrichum gloeosporioides) requires a suitable disease incidence assessment on harvested papaya (Carica papaya) fruits. The minimum number of papaya fruit harvests was determined for valid treatment comparison in field trials for anthracnose chemical control. Repeatability analysis was done using previously published data. The coefficient determination (R²) estimate range, using four methods, and based on means of 12 assessment times, was 92.58 < R² < 94.45%. The number of assessment times required for R²=90% varied from seven to nine. The R² values of 85.1 < R² < 91.3% estimated by ANOVA suggested that any seven successive assessment times were sufficient for treatment comparison. Estudos de controle químico da antracnose (Colletotrichum gloeosporioides) em mamoeiro (Carica papaya), no campo, requerem avaliação da intensidade da doença em frutos após a colheita. Determinou-se o número mínimo de épocas de avaliação (colheitas) necessárias para comparação adequada de tratamentos. A análise de repetibilidade foi aplicada a dados previamente publicados. Estimativas usando quatro métodos resultaram em coeficientes de determinação (R²), baseados na média de 12 épocas de avaliações, de 92,58 < R² < 94,45% e o número de épocas de avaliações requerido para obter R² = 90%, variou de sete a nove. O R² estimado por ANOVA indicou que quaisquer sete épocas de avaliação sucessivas foram suficientes para comparação entre tratamentos, apresentando 85,1 < R² < 91,3%

Minimum number of assessment times to compare chemical control treatments for papaya fruit anthracnose