English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

DOI: 10.1590/2179-8966/2019/45690 Resumo O artigo busca aprofundar agenda de pesquisa que venho desenvolvendo a respeito da reproducao socio-juridica do capitalismo. Sua premissa e a de que a acumulacao do capital e constituida de dois lados contraditorios e entrelacados: a troca de equivalentes e a expropriacao. Neste sentido, sustento que a critica da forma juridica do capitalismo, tal como formulada por Eugen Paschukanis, limita-se a examinar a posicao do direito no quadro da troca de equivalentes, da forma e do fetichismo das mercadorias. Em sua fase expansionista, no entanto, a acumulacao do capital depende da mercantilizacao de espacos ainda nao mercantilizados, ou seja, de um ato de violencia aberta – e nao fetichizada – capaz de impor relacoes sociais capitalistas a territorios e grupos, aos quais essas relacoes ainda sao relativa ou completamente estranhas. Esta fase e analisada com base na teoria marxista da acumulacao primitiva e da expropriacao. Frente a essas condicoes, minha hipotese e que o direito aparece como violencia juridica explicita que prescreve escancaradamente a desigualdade social. Ao final, levanto algumas questoes para refletir sobre a relacao dessa violencia com a emancipacao social. Palavras-chaves: Capitalismo; Troca de Equivalentes; Expropriacoes; Forma Juridica; Violencia Juridica. Abstract The article analyses the socio-legal enforcement and reproduction of capitalism. Capitalist accumulation has two contradictory and entangled sides: exchange of equivalents and expropriation. The thesis is that the critique of the legal form of capitalism as formulated by Eugen Paschukanis cannot really understand the development of capitalism, since it examines the position of law only within the framework of the equivalent form and the commodity fetishism. In its expansionist phase, however, the accumulation of capital depends on the commodifying of not yet commodified spaces, that is, on an act of open - and not fetishized - violence capable of imposing capitalist social relations in territories and groups where these relations are still relatively or completely strange. This phase is analysed on the basis of the Marxist account of the primitive accumulation and expropriation. Under these conditions, my hypothesis is that the law appears as explicit legal violence that blatantly prescribes social inequality. At the end, I propose some questions to reflect on the place of this violence in social emancipation. Keywords : Capitalism; Equivalent Form of Commodities; Expropriation; Legal Form; Legal Violence.

Forma e Violência Jurídica na Acumulação Capitalista: sobre relações de troca e expropriação