English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

DOI: 10.1590/2179-8966/2018/35106. Resumo Este trabalho revisita a centenaria controversia entre Eugen Ehrlich e Hans Kelsen acerca do estudo cientifico do direito, com base na analise dos textos originais publicados no Arquivo para a ciencia social e politica social (1915-1917). A analise da reacao critica de Kelsen ao projeto de Ehrlich demonstra que a trajetoria da sociologia do direito na historia do pensamento juridico tem sido marcada desde o inicio pelo embate com a dogmatica juridica. Palavras-chave: Sociologia do Direito; Eugen Ehrlich; Hans Kelsen. Abstract This work revisits the centenary controversy between Eugen Ehrlich and Hans Kelsen on the scientific study of law, based on the analysis of the original texts published in the Archive for social science and social welfare (1915-1917). The analysis of Kelsen’s critical reaction to Ehrlich’s project shows that the trajectory of sociology of law in the history of legal thought has been marked from the beginning by the clash with legal dogmatics. Keywords: Sociology of Law; Eugen Ehrlich; Hans Kelsen.

Sociologia do direito contra dogmática: revisitando o debate Ehrlich-Kelsen