English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Urban interventions are communicational practices inscribed on the surfaces of cities, which disrupt normality and interfere in their landscape and everyday life. Many interventions can be read as political actions and generate diverse meanings, with positive and negative impacts and reverberations. This article adopts Ranciere’s concepts of dissensus / consensus and politics / police in order to detect claims and undertake the analysis of two urban interventions in London in 2015 and 2016. I observed that hegemonic discourses can appropriate urban interventions, as well as contemporary creative and activist manifestations can become  consensus, as part of the increasing phenomena of gentrification and commodification of urban space. These processes are permeated by the neoliberal rationale and bring with them the contradictions, the complexity and the ambivalences in contemporary cities.

Intervenções sobre as superfícies urbanas: dissenso, consenso e ambivalências em Londres