English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The Valladolid Debate (1550-1551), sought to establish human parameters regarding the indigenous peoples of the Americas in order to justify their conversion to Catholicism. Did the Indians possess a soul? Could they be converted to Christianity? How? Such were the questions of the scholars of that time. But we are interested in the philosopher Enrique Dussel’s reading of the Debate, especially concerning two questions we consider relevant. One is the connection with the “communication community” as posed by the German philosopher Karl Otto Apel, and the other is Dussel’s exposure of what he calls the “myth of modernity” and its corresponding critique. We see Dussel’s analysis become more effective day by day. Who are considered humans today? With whom can we dialogue? Who do we consider having something valuable to tell us? These are some of the questions that guide this work.

Una actualización de la Disputa de Valladolid, o acerca de cómo se ingresa en la comunidad de comunicación