English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

RESUMO: Com o objetivo de reduzir a pobreza, a partir do ano de 2013 o governo brasileiro promoveu a desoneracao da cesta basica e aumentou o valor do Programa Bolsa Familia (PBF). Este trabalho busca analisar qual das duas opcoes de politica teria maior impacto sobre as familias mais pobres caso os recursos destinados as duas fossem iguais. Em seguida buscou-se verificar qual nivel de focalizacao requerido para o PBF igualaria os impactos das duas politicas. Para tanto se construiu um modelo de equilibrio geral com tempo discreto e familias heterogeneas. Os resultados mostram quea elevacao das transferencias gera maior beneficio sobre o bem-estar da classe mais pobre do que a desoneracao da cesta basica. Tal resultado se mantem para um nivel de focalizacao do PBF a partir de 35,4%. Para niveis de focalizacao menores que esse, a desoneracao da cesta basica passa a ser preferivel. PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Bolsa Familia; desoneracao da cesta basica; nivel de focalizacao; equilibrio geral computavel  ABSTRACT: In order to reduce poverty, from 2013 onwards, the Brazilian government promoted the exemption of the basic food basket and increased the value of the Bolsa Familia Program (PBF). This paper seeks to analyze which of the two policy options would have greater impact on the poorest households if the funds for the two were equal. Next, it was calculated which level of targeting required for the PBF would equal the impacts of the two policies. For this purpose a general equilibrium model was built with discrete time and heterogeneous households. The results show that the increase of the transfers generates greater benefit on the welfare of the poorer class than the relief of the basic basket. This result is maintained at a target level of PBF at least 35.4%. For lower levels of targeting, the relief of the basket becomes preferable. KEYWORDS: Bolsa Familia; tax relief; focalization level; computable general equilibrium

DESONERAÇÃO DA CESTA BÁSICA OU EXPANSÃO DO PROGRAMA BOLSA FAMÍLIA? UMA SIMULAÇÃO POR EQUILÍBRIO GERAL COMPUTÁVEL