English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Initially, I should say of my satisfaction and sense of responsibility for commenting on an article drawn from the national survey Birth in Brazil. This survey is a milestone in the production of knowledge about birthcare models in the country, given its relevance, comprehensiveness and uniqueness. Except for c-section, episiotomy and painrelief in normal vaginal delivery, the other data presented on the article are unique. I had not known of information about the other obstetric practices and interventions during childbirth – nutrition, mobility, use of a partogram, use of peripheral intravenous line, oxytocin infusion, amniotomy, lithotomy position in labor, Kristeller maneuver (uterine fundal pressure during expulsion of fetus), and normal vaginal delivery without interventions –, other than in partial or limited studies. In addition, as commentator, I have the freedom-of-interpretation privilege without having to stick to the “immanence” of the results. It is probable that the “idea of safety” regarding birthcare, with timely interventions to prevent morbid outcomes is mixed up with the goals of swiftness and opportunism, in detriment of the “idea of physiology” of the birth. The c-section is a way to swiftly resolve delivery to low-risk (45.5%) and other pregnant women (60.3%). For women considered as being of low risk, another way to shorten delivery is to perform interventions that prompt, expedite, hasten, or quicken the care-provision process. The interventions that, successfully or not, accelerate the vaginal delivery include: amniotomy and oxytocin infusion for cervical dilation; Kristeller and episiotomy for fetus expulsion. For the women of the investigation, the mainstay of health-care delivery is centered in the clinic and the practitioner, rather than on the woman and the childbirth process. Thus, some of the results observed in the study include a higher exposure of nulliparous women to oxytocin infusion, Kristeller maneuver and episiotomy; higher chance of poorly educated women undergo amniotomy and receive oxytocin when giving birth in public health facilities; also for those who give birth in the Central region of the country, in addition to Kristeller maneuver and episiotomy. Even in birth centers where only low-risk women are attended, some unnecessary interventions are highly performed. Amniotomy and oxytocin infusion rates reach 75.1% and 46.3%, Maria Luiza Gonzalez Riesco

Nascer no Brasil "em tempo": uma questão de hierarquia das intervenções no parto?