English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

[Purpose] We compared the durations of standing while holding horizontal and vertical poles in patients with severe hemiplegia and consequent difficulty in maintaining a standing position. [Participants and Methods] Nine patients with post-stroke hemiplegia and consequent difficulty in maintaining a standing position between parallel bars. In each patient, we measured the duration of standing while holding a horizontal (Condition-A) or vertical (Condition-B) pole using one hand for 5 days for comparison. [Results] The duration of standing was significantly longer under Condition-B compared with -A on all days (p<0.05). Six patients became able to maintain a standing position for 60 seconds under Condition-B on the fifth day, but they did not under Condition-A. [Conclusion] Vertical poles should be considered in patients with severe hemiplegia and consequent difficulty in maintaining a standing position between parallel bars.

A Comparison of the Durations of Standing While Holding Horizontal and Vertical Poles in Patients with Hemiplegia