English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

[Purpose] This study aimed to examine the impact of changing the drop vertical jump stance time on kinematic and kinetic parameters by ordering to high jump or quick jump for consistent stance time and a more accurate assessment of anterior cruciate ligament injury risk. [Participants and Methods] The participants were 20 healthy female students. The drop vertical jump was started by instructing the participants to stand on a 30-cm platform with both legs stationary. The task was performed while the participants were instructed to perform high jump or quick jump. [Results] Stance time was significantly shorter with quick jump than with high jump. Quick jump showed significantly higher knee abduction angles at initial contact and peak vertical ground reaction force, and lower hip flexion, knee flexion, and ankle dorsiflexion angles at the lowest point of the center of mass. Quick jump showed a significantly higher peak vertical ground reaction force. The knee abduction moment at initial contact was not significantly different between the 2 conditions. [Conclusion] Quick jump was better than high jump for making stance time consistent, and the differences in kinematic and kinetic characteristics by oral instructions should be considered when using drop vertical jump.

Effects of different oral instructions on kinematic and kinetic parameters during drop vertical jump