English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

In the field of software reengineering, many component identification approaches have been proposed for evolving legacy systems into component-based systems. Understanding the behaviors of various component identification approaches is the first important step to meaningfully employ them for legacy systems evolution, therefore we performed an empirical study on component identification technology with considerations of their similarity measures, clustering approaches and stopping criteria. We proposed a set of evaluation criteria and developed the tool CIETool to automate the process of component identification and evaluation. The experimental results revealed that many components of poor quality were produced by the employed component identification approaches; that is, many of the identified components were tightly coupled, weakly cohesive, or had inappropriate numbers of implementation classes and interface operations. Finally, we presented an analysis on the component identification approaches according to the proposed evaluation criteria, which suggested that the weaknesses of these clustering approaches were the major reasons that caused components of poor-quality. key words: component identification, evaluation criteria, legacy system, software reengineering, empirical study

Component Identification and Evaluation for Legacy Systems-An Empirical Study-