English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Zendy Pro

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Presents AI Discovery search usage as a premium feature

AI Discovery

Presents AI Discovery explain and summary usage as a premium feature

Content Analysis

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

1500 Top-up

3000 Top-up

Zendy Basic

2500 Top-up

Zendy Unlimited

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

The article discusses the basic principles of the construction of the activities of forensic examination, interrelated with the assessment and control of expert opinion. The conditions for the production of opinions are disclosed, including state forensic activities and activities carried out by non-state experts. Control is represented as a single process in observing the basic principle of the activity of forensic examination through the independence of the expert, in the process of research and conclusions of the expert opinion. The basic criteria for the quality of forensic activity have been established, which determine its indicators in achieving a common goal. The analytical activity of forensic science, as part of the judicial process, determines its dynamism in the sphere of action of procedural requirements for legal proceedings. It seems that a unity of an adaptive nature in the basics of monitoring professional analysis and the results of forensic examination with respect to expert opinion is presented.

ADAPTIVE CHARACTER OF CONTROL IN JUDICIAL EXAMINATION.