English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This article clarifies the definition of the quality of project documentation, as the degree of compliance of the composition, content, volume and presentation of project documents with the requirements of existing standards, taking into account the factors of errors and the level of graphic display of documents originals and copies. Considered measures to improve the quality of the procedure of field supervision, as a stage of the design process based on an analysis of the quality of the process of restora (reconstruction) of the tramway section.The authors assessed the quality of the design process and determined its effectiveness at the stages of the design life cycle depends on the application of various methods. For example, for the first stage we apply the method of the context diagram and the decomposition of the first level, i.e. life cycle process. The second stage of the analysis included the monitoring of the author’s supervision process, and it was concluded that the effectiveness of the quality assessment would be achieved by applying an element of the balanced scorecard methodology – that is, strategic map.The final stage of the work involved identifying the risks of the author’s supervision process and developing measures to eliminate them, so one of the process indicators, “The number of inconsistencies found during the author’s supervision”, was taken into account. To identify the root causes of deviations, the indicator under consideration, a quality control tool was used – the causal diagram of K. Ishikawa.To determine the risk of the process of field supervision and the proposal of measures to reduce its level, the P-FMEA method of analysis was used. For the third stage in the assessment of the name of the indicator: «Satisfaction of the group of architectural supervision of the production environment». The goal is to increase the level of production environment conditions.The goal is to increase the level of production environment conditions. The perspective of this indicator on the MTP is the section “Training and Development”. The method of assessing the indicator can serve as an adapted technique SERVQAUAL for the process of conducting field supervision.

Modern methods of analysis and quality assurance of the complex engineering structures design process