English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This article addresses the way the Israeli criminal system uses secret evidence during the initial stages of criminal procedure. In particular, the article discusses whether terror suspects should enjoy the same criminal procedure as regular criminal suspects, or whether the procedure should differ. The article identifies the underlying theories which guide the criminal justice system and applies them to Israeli criminal procedure with regards to privileged evidence. The article reviews how comparative law has approached the issue of secret evidence when it comes to terror suspects, and finally, discusses Israel’s Counter Terrorism Memorandum Bill .

The Tension between Due Process of Law and Counter-Terrorist Measures During the Initial Stages of Criminal Procedure