English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

The need to relieve the Romanian judicial system from the large number of cases, coupled with the assignment of specific prerogatives to certain people, bodies or institutions regarding the settlement of certain disputes, has resulted in the extension of arbitration as a significant way of settling litigations of a private nature. This article presents some issues referring to arbitration in Romania, and then analyze, from the perspective of the New Romanian Code of Civil Procedure, the features of a settlement pronounced as a result of ad-hoc domestic-law arbitration, called arbitral decision, stressing elements of novelty and essential changes brought to it.

THE ARBITRAL DECISION PRONOUNCED IN AD-HOC DOMESTICLAW ARBITRATION IN THE REGULATION OF THE NEW ROMANIAN CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE