English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Improving teaching performance is most likely an act that leads to substantial gains in student learning, essential to know the strengths of teachers and those aspects of their practice which could be further developed. Th e objective of this research is to fi nd out the eff ect of incentive, leadership, and work motivation on teacher performance. Research fi ndings showed a direct eff ect of incentive reward on teacher performance, which reached the value of 0.350, whereas the indirect eff ect of incentive on teacher performance through work motivation was at the value of 0.155. Th e direct eff ect of school principal leadership on teacher performance was at the value of 0.156, whereas the indirect eff ect of school principal leadership on performance through work motivation was 0.094. Th e direct eff ect of work motivation on performance reached the value of 0.378.

The Effect of Incentive Reward, School Principal Leadership, Work Motivation on the Performance of Senior High School Teachers in Medan