English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

We try to show in this paper, how the qualifier “human”has to be used, in the expression “humanity,”or “integrity of the human species.”It doesn’t disclose any human essence, and we reject what we could call “the Thesis,”by which such an expression would introduce a difference of being between us an others animals and by which we would know immediately from ourselves, what the humanity of a human species could be. We argue on the contrary that the human species is constituted through a complex relation of power, by which, thanks to the growth of natural sciences, we are able to act technically and medically on the action of our future offspring. Yet, this relation is also a symbolical one, which is founded on a non reciprocal principle of “constructability”: despite acting as if the humanity of the human species could be treated as a political problem that can be solved only with biological criteria, we must act as if the humanity of the human species has to be thought in the same time as a political norm. By this second “as if”we have to constitute ourselves as the representative of our future offspring in an open and democratic relation that we try to analyse and develop.

Concerning a Special Use of the Concept of 'Humanity', as a Political Norm Disclosed in a Complex Communication's Structure