English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This	 thesis	 explores	 the	 obstacles	 in	 establishing	 a	 consistent	 and	 effective response	 framework	 for	 humanitarian	 catastrophe,	 and	 the	 importance	 of maintaining	 a	 sustained	 dialogue	 to	 this	 end.	 It	 does	 so	 by	 recognizing	 the underlying	 conflict	 between	 two	 positions:	 the	 norm	 of	 non-­‐intervention	 of	 states into	 the	 affairs	 of	 others,	 and	 the	 protection	 of	 individuals	 caught	 in	 the	 middle	 of violent	 conflict.	 The	 importance	 of	 working	 towards	 a	 resolution	 of	 this	 conflict	 is illustrated	 through	 the	 case	 study	 of	 Darfur,	 where	 a	 divided	 international community	 led	 an	 insufficient	 response	 to	 the	 crisis	 that	 can	 ultimately	 be	 judged as	 a	 failure.	 Lastly,	 a	 recent	 attempt	 at	 reconciling	 the	 non-­‐ intervention/protection	 conflict	 is	 examined	 through	 the	 report	 of	 the Responsibility	 to	 Protect,	 which	 takes	 important	 steps	 in	 the	 direction	 of consensus,	 but	 ultimately	 suffers	 from	 inflated	 expectations	 regarding	 its	 scope or	 purpose.

Between Non-intervention and Protection: A study on the case of Darfur and the Responsibility to Protect