English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Background High quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is imperative to obtain a better outcome after a sudden cardiac arrest. However, a gold standard for training and evaluating CPR performance is lacking. In our institution, we recently changed from an observer only method (OOM) to a combined observer and electronic feedback method (EFM).

Determining the equivalence of currently most used methods for evaluating cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance