English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Let $R$ be a commutative ring, $Y\subseteq \mathrm{Spec}(R)$ and $ h_Y(S)=\{P\in Y:S\subseteq P \}$, for every $S\subseteq R$. An ideal $I$ is said to be an $\mathcal{H}_Y$-ideal whenever it follows from $h_Y(a)\subseteq h_Y(b)$ and $a\in I$ that $b\in I$. A strong $\mathcal{H}_Y$-ideal is defined in the same way by replacing an arbitrary finite set $F$ instead of the element $a$. In this paper these two classes of ideals (which are based on the spectrum of the ring $R$ and are a generalization of the well-known concepts semiprime ideal, z-ideal, $z^{\circ}$-ideal (d-ideal), sz-ideal and $sz^{\circ}$-ideal ($\xi$-ideal)) are studied. We show that the most important results about these concepts, "Zariski topology", "annihilator" and etc can be extended in such a way that the corresponding consequences seems to be trivial and useless. This comprehensive look helps to recognize the resemblances and differences of known concepts better.

An extension of $z$-ideals and $z^\circ$-ideals