English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

This review discusses phytoextraction and phytostabilisation of acid mine drainage (AMD) alongside with their benefits and limitations with case studies. Furthermore, plants associated with these two approaches of phytoremediation and impact of AMD on aquatic macrophytes used for phytoremediation were also reviewed. Both phytoextraction and phytostabilisation approaches are promising technologies in remediating AMD. However, their limitation of low metal removal and the lack of knowledge of minimum amendments required for their effective remediation call for the proposal, herein made, to combine aquatic macrophytes, as well as include plants from a wide range of families capable of phytoextraction and phytostabilisation in the remediation of AMD.

PHYTOEXTRACTION AND PHYTOSTABILISATION APPROACHES OF HEAVY METAL REMEDIATION IN ACID MINE DRAINAGE WITH CASE STUDIES: A REVIEW