English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Teacher misconceptions about the nature and intent of Technology education (henceforth, Technology) in school sectors is of concern. Research suggests that elementary teachers too often do not have a basic grasp of the central tenets associated with Technology and how it differs from Science. Research by Atkinson (2000) has found that teacher educators too often design Technology lessons with a linear problem solving approach, leaving little opportunity for student creativity and imagination. Using a large sample of Initial Teacher Education (ITE) students (N = 830) this study found that early childhood education ITEs were less inclined to agree with the notion that Technology was mostly about creativity, design, and showing others your ideas. In addition, students thought that creativity was more applicable to Technology (as opposed to Science), although older male students thought that creativity was more relevant to both subjects. Implications for policy and practice are discussed.

Initial teacher education students’ conceptions of creativity in technology and science education: A large-scale New Zealand study