English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

This paper discusses the theme of the principle of morality and its application by the Brazilian Supreme Court in the trial of Criminal Case n. 470. Despite the constant claims of violations of the principle of morality in the application of defendants’ penalties, the Supreme Court did not care to draw up an objective definition of this principle to substantiate its custodial sentences. This lack of objectivity corresponds to the abstract notion of this principle, which contradicts modern democratic philosophy based on the ideas of Baruch Spinoza. In doing so, without providing an objective definition of the principle, the Supreme Court has actually engaged in revelation, which can also be understood through Spinoza's philosophy.

Moralism and Democracy in the Trial of Criminal Case N. 470 (Brazil): An Open Constitutional Challenge