Forensic Hypnosis and the Courts
Author(s) -
Brent A. Paterline
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
journal of law and criminal justice
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 2374-2674
pISSN - 2374-2682
DOI - 10.15640/jlcj.v4n2a1
Subject(s) - hypnosis , psychology , recall , leading question , suggestibility , state (computer science) , cognitive psychology , medicine , computer science , alternative medicine , pathology , algorithm
The theory behind the use of forensic hypnosis is the belief that under hypnosis a subject’s concentration is heightened to the point where they can recall details of a crime that seem to elude them in a conscious state. Hypnosis is believed to cause subjects more to be more attentive, focused and less prone to analytical thinking which can block memory. Forensic hypnotists often claim that hypnosis has proven to be a valuable tool in enhancing or recovering past memories. Scientific research, however, suggests, fairly overwhelmingly, that hypnosis does not reliably increase the accuracy of eyewitness recall and recognition; rather, the research shows that when effects do occur, hypnosis can produce an increase in false, distorted, or manufactured memories. The purpose of this paper is to examine the treatment that the U.S. court system has accorded hypnotic testimony. An examination of early court cases reveals that hypnosis was not accepted in the courtroom, but recently courts have been more willing to admit hypnotic testimony, providing certain procedures are followed.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom