English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Free Plan

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

The article is the first part of the study in the scope of contains a comparative analysis of the two concepts of anthropological mercy: the religious, in the mystical sense, concept of Faustina Kowalska (Diary) and the ethical-religious, in the reflective sense, concept of Joseph Tischner. This article concerns the anthropological mercy in the approach of Kowalska. The general similarities between this two concepts in religious dimension allow us to consider them from the perspective of one problem: the interaction between the ethics and the religion. The problem is studied on the basis of ontological (theo-)anthropology (a person is researched from the perspectives of the possibility and obligation of being self). The purpose of the analysis is a justification for the thesis that the interaction between the ethics and the religion is based on metaphysical factor. This purpose is achieved by demonstrating that the ethical-religious anthropological mercy in the philosophical approach of Tischner have a metaphysical basis and essence − and that in this metaphysical terms can be explained the phenomena of the religious anthropological mercy in the Diary.

analecta cracoviensia

Miłosierdzie antropologiczne w doświadczeniu mistycznym (Faustyna Kowalska) i refleksji filozoficznej (Józef Tischner). Elementy (teo-)antropologii ontologicznej Część I