English (United Kingdom)

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/featured_content/oa?rat=en

https://curated-unify.zendy.io/wp-json/zendy-region/v1/highlighted_journal/

Global: Zendy Plus annual

Presents the access of premium content as premium feature

Premium Content

Presents the keyphrase highlighting as premium feature

Keyphrase Highlighting

Presents the summarisation as premium feature

Summarisation

Insights

Presents the pdf analysis as premium feature

PDF Analysis

Presents the zaia usage as premium feature

ZAIA

Global: Zendy Plus monthly

Global: Zendy Tools annual

Global: Zendy Tools monthly

Global: Zendy Free Plan

For several years, I have committed myself to artistic research; a commitment both as a poet and as a scholar in Gender Studies. In this article I start to raise questions about the status of the “I” in feminist academic texts – and the idea of the “I” as a sign pointing towards situatedness and accountability. I do this through experiences of writing in an “I” form, using the pronoun “I”, in poetry and fiction writing. The method used is writing as a method of nomadic inquiry (Richardson & Adams St. Pierre 2005). This is a method in which one tries to shape one’s thinking through writing, instead of reporting what one has thought already. Regarding the article’s theoretical inspiration, I would declare poetry and feminist philosophy as the main sources. This means that I consider both poetry/fiction writing and philosophy to be fruitful spheres for knowledge production. The aim of the article is to ask questions about the “I”, in ways trying to evoke some of the feminist complexity attached to this pronoun.

The I/eye is in the verb: Towards a poetics of the feminist poetic I